Insurance verification

Make every claim photo part of the case.

Compare submitted damage images with the claimed event, repair estimate and related records. Give reviewers specific findings and evidence requests.

01

Collect required views

Guide claimants through the views needed for the reported loss.

02

Connect images to records

Match the asset and damage areas across photos, the claim and the repair estimate.

03

Resolve coverage gaps

Request missing close-ups or supporting evidence and route unresolved discrepancies for review.

Follow the evidence

See the checks.
Understand the next step.

Example workflow / Claim C-1036

Understand the claim in context.

Review required

01 / Evidence

Select a source to trace its findings.

02 / Findings

What agrees, what conflicts, what is missing.

Reported area is visible

The claim and image identify the same rear panel.

Estimate includes another area

The front bumper repair has no supporting photo in this case.

Close-up needed

Request a closer view to assess the reported damage.

03 / YOUR RULE

If an estimate includes an unsupported damage area, request evidence before approval.

04 / NEXT ACTIONRequest bumper evidence → Adjuster review

Illustrative records and outcomes. Your evidence requirements, decision rules and review thresholds define the workflow.

Make each review actionable

Focus on the exceptions that matter.

Missing damage views

Claimants rarely know which angles an adjuster needs, so required views are defined for the reported loss and the missing close-up is requested at capture time.

Photos detached from the claim

Images arrive without a clear link to the asset or claimed event, so each photo is matched to the vehicle, damage area and claim record before review.

Unexplained estimate items

A repair estimate may include areas no photo supports, so unsupported line items are flagged and routed for review instead of being approved by default.

Common questions

Which claim photos does the workflow expect?
The views needed for the reported loss: the full asset, the damaged area in context and a close-up of each claimed damage point, plus any video or documents the claimant provides. Required views are defined per loss type and requested at capture.
What happens when a photo does not support the claim?
If an estimate includes a repair area no photo shows, or a submitted image does not match the claimed asset or event, the workflow flags the specific item and either requests the missing view or routes the claim to a reviewer with the sources attached.
How is pricing scoped for claim photo verification?
Claim photo workflows are scoped by claim volume, required views, integrations and review requirements, so pricing follows a discussion of your process. The single-photo verification API, vehicle inspections and appraisals keep their per-unit catalog prices on the pricing page.

What do you need to verify?

Tell us about the evidence, the decision and the workflow around it.

Discuss your workflow